Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 F.2d 459 - Brown v. United States

Brown v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

396 F.2d 459 · 1968

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
September 2008
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently September 2008

5 federal appellate ·

12019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 1234 · 26 U.S.C. § 163 · 26 U.S.C. § 212

Relies on Douglas v. Alabama · Knetsch v. United States · Royal Netherlands Steamship Co. v. Strachan Shipping Co. · Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. United States · Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In computing net income there shall be allowed as deductions : ... . (e) Losses by individuals. In the case of an individual, losses sustained during the taxable year and not compensated for by insurance or otherwise— . . . (3) of property not connected with the trade or business, if the loss arises from fires, storms, shipwreck, or other casualty, or from theft.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(a) General Rule. — There shall be allowed as a deduction all interest paid or accrued within the taxable year on indebtedness.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “losses incurred in any transaction entered into for profit, though not connected with a trade or business.” This statutory language is amplified by section 1.165-l(b), Income Tax Regs., as follows: To be allowable as a deduction under section 165(a), a loss must be evidenced by closed and completed transactions, fixed by identifiable events, and * * * actually sustained during the taxable year. Only a bona fide loss is allowable. Substance and not mere form shall govern in determining a deductible loss. The adjuration that substance must control over form compels us to view the relevant”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.