Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 F.2d 701 - Bazemore v. Stehling

Bazemore v. Stehling’s Empirical Analysis

396 F.2d 701 · 1968

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
August 2008
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently August 2008 · most notably Machinery Rental, Inc. v. Herpel (1980), Rose Pass Mines, Inc. v. Howard (1980)

21 federal appellate ·

19019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morimura, Arai & Co. v. Taback · Phillips. v. Baker · Banks v. Siegel · Porterfield v. Gerstel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court shall grant the discharge unless satisfied that the bankrupt has * * * (3) while engaged in business as a sole proprietor, partnership, or as an executive of a corporation, obtained for such business money or property on credit * * * by making or publishing * * * in any manner whatsoever a materially false statement in writing respecting his financial condition or the financial condition of such partnership or corporation * * * Provided, That if, upon the hearing * * * the objector shall show to the satisfaction of the court that there are reasonable grounds for believing that the bankrupt has committed any of the acts which * * * would prevent his discharge * * * then the burden of proving that he has not committed any of such acts shall be upon the bankrupt.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “do not determine whether the district judge's findings were clearly erroneous but whether the findings of the referee were; if the referee's findings were not clearly erroneous the district judge was bound to accept them,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “what they said was totally inconsistent with what [they] did,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.