Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 F.2d 764 - Small v. United States

Small v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

396 F.2d 764 · 1968

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
December 1975
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1465

Relies on Andrews v. United States · Gray v. United States · Birdsell v. United States · Garcia v. United States · Barba-Reyes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The purpose of Rule 41(e) in requiring Motions to Suppress to be introduced prior to trial is to facilitate a uniform presentation of the facts and law to the jury with as few disruptive intervals as possible. Although the trial judge is free to exercise judicial discretion when a motion is offered for the first time during the trial where there would be obvious prejudice to the defendant, the granting of such a motion.is disfavored where counsel was fully aware of the facts prior to trial and had ample opportunity to present the motion. [Citations omitted].””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““. . . . The motion shall be made before trial or hearing unless opportunity therefor did not exist or the defendant was not aware of the grounds for the motion, but the court in its discretion may entertain the motion at the trial or hearing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.