Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 F.2d 822 - White v. United States

White v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

396 F.2d 822 · 1968

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
September 1985
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently September 1985 · most notably William Foxworth v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections (1975), United States v. Medel (1979)

20 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

230196819701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5002 · 26 U.S.C. § 5601

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Hormel v. Helvering · Carafas v. J · Peyton v. Rowe · MacKenna v. Ellis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The Constitution assures a defendant effective representation by counsel whether the attorney is one of his choosing or court-appointed. Such representation is lacking, however, if counsel, unknown to the accused and without his knowledgeable assent, is in a duplicitous position where his full talents — as a vigorous advocate having the single aim of acquittal by all means fair and honorable — are hobbled or fettered or restrained by commitments to others.” [Citations omitted]. Porter v. United States, 298 F.2d 461, 463 (5th Cir. 1962); cf. White v. United States, 396 F.2d 822, 824 (5th Cir. 1968).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.