Ziady v. Curley’s Empirical Analysis
396 F.2d 873 · 1968
Citation profile
20 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably Krasnov v. Dinan (1972), Sadat v. Mertes (1980)
20 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1862 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Margaret Williamson v. Katherine Osenton · Hinderlider v. La Plata River & Cherry Creek Ditch Co. · Lamar v. Micou
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“one of the principal purposes of diversity jurisdiction was to give a citizen of one state access to an unbiased court to protect him from parochialism if he was forced into litigation in another state in which he was a stranger and of which his opponent was a citizen”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The question of domicile can arise, in regard to the diversity clause of Article III, § 2 of the Federal Constitution and under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 , only in federal court. The problem is, therefore, one uniquely of federal cognizance and the considerations underlying Erie R.R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 [ 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 ] (1938), do not obtain.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“basic concept of feudal law that a married woman could have no separate legal existence apart from her husband,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.