Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 F.3d 1007 - Raney v. Barnhart

Raney v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis

396 F.3d 1007 · 2005

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
June 2017
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 3 district ·

Relationships

Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Stormo v. Barnhart · Sheila J. Young v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Roberts v. Apfel · Shontos v. Barnhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Substantial evidence is relevant evidence that a reasonable mind would accept as adequate to support the Commissioner's conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “permitted to consider any inconsistencies found within the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.