Little v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
396 F.3d 1319 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · White v. Pearlman · United States v. Martinez · Earl Earnest Scott v. United States · Hurley v. Moore
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In reviewing the district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition, we review questions of law de novo and the court's findings of fact for clear error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Coloma v. Holder“[A] delay in the commencement of a sentence cannot, by itself, constitute service of that sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.