Harvey v. Veneman’s Empirical Analysis
396 F.3d 28 · 2005
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 9 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 555 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 7 U.S.C. § 6501 (Organic Foods Production Act of 1990) · 7 U.S.C. § 6502 · 7 U.S.C. § 6505 · 7 U.S.C. § 6509 · 7 U.S.C. § 6510 · 7 U.S.C. § 6514 · 7 U.S.C. § 6515
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of Virginia · Rust v. Sullivan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The National List may provide for the use of substances in an organic farming or handling operation that are otherwise prohibited under this title only if ... (B) the substance.... (iii) is used in handling and is non-synthetic but is not organically produced....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harvey v. Johanns“lacks coherence and consistency, creating ambiguity concerning Congress' intent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.