Galicia v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
396 F.3d 446 · 2005
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Aguilar-Solis v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Albathani v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft · Silva v. Ashcroft · Mukamusoni v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An immigration judge, like other judicial officers, possesses broad (though not uncabined) discretion over the conduct of trial proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sharari v. Gonzáles“[t]he offer of evidence was made on the day of the hearing, in violation of ... the local rule requiring pre-hearing marking of exhibits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Sharari v. Gonzáles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.