Hooper v. Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis
396 F.3d 744 · 2005
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson · Carden v. Arkoma Associates · Pujol v. Shearson/American Express, Inc. · Curley v. Brignoli, Curley & Roberts Associates · HB General Corp. v. Manchester Partners, L.P.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When assessing prejudice, the court must consider whether the interests of an absent party are adequately represented by those already a party to the litigation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Even though the Partnership has its own interests, it is an artificial entity: its interests must ultimately derive from the interests of the human beings that are its members (albeit through the medium of other partnerships and corporations).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moss v. Princip“A partnership's interests as an entity consist of an aggregation of those interests of each of the individual partners that are relevant to the purpose of the partnership.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moss v. Princip
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.