Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 F.3d 95 - Muntaqim v. Coombe

Muntaqim v. Coombe’s Empirical Analysis

396 F.3d 95 · 2004

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
May 2006
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 46 · 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)

Relies on Gregory v. Ashcroft

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whether, on the pleadings, a claim that a New York State statute, Section 5-106 of the New York Election Law, that disenfranchises currently imprisoned felons and parolees results in unlawful vote dilution, can state a claim for violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.