Ismail v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
396 F.3d 970 · 2005
Citation profile
40 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Menjivar v. Gonzales (2005), Fofanah v. Gonzales (2006)
40 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Hartooni v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Perinpanathan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Feleke v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Krasnopivtsev v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“that the outcome of the proceedings may well have been different had the due process violation not occurred.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.