Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

396 F. App'x 910

United States v. Cross

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 4, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-10-04

Decided 2010-10-04

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion for lack of personal jurisdiction under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/396/fappx/910 · .json · Public domain