Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

396 F. App'x 924

United States v. Smith

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 8, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-10-08

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2011

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-10-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Richard Allen Smith, Jr., appeals the district court’s “Order Reducing Term of Imprisonment as a Result of Amended Guideline Range Pursuant to [U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § ] 1B1.10 [ (2008) ].” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith, No. 2:00-er-00007-FPS-JES-l (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/396/fappx/924 · .json · Public domain