Gray v. EMC Mortgage

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 1, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-10-01

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2011

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-10-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 *961Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Jeffrey K. Gray appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Gray’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Gray has forfeited review of the court’s order. we affirm. We deny Gray’s to appoint counsel an dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.