Juvenile’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently October 2005
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kent v. United States · Michigan v. Doran · Hardy v. State · Ayers v. Ratshesky · Maldonado
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] Person charged in any State . . . who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall on Demand . . . be delivered up, to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. In Re OM · In re O.M.“Where the petitioners have been charged with a crime in the demanding State, the asylum State has an `obligation to deliver, without any reference to the character of the crime charged, or to the policy or laws of the State to which the fugitive has fled' under the interstate rendition clause of the United States Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Any parens patriae interest in juveniles an asylum State might have does not extend to preventing alleged offenders from being brought to trial as swiftly as possible in the State where an alleged offense was committed”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re OM
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.