Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 N.E.2d 953 - State v. Rehborg

State v. Rehborg’s Empirical Analysis

1979

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently March 2019

7 state decisions

5019791980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Randolph v. State · Hensley v. State · State Ex Rel. Wickliffe v. Judge of the Criminal Court · State Ex Rel. Wernke v. Super. Ct. of Hendricks Cty. · State Ex Rel. Back v. Starke Circuit Court

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “... when prior to the expiration of the period set by the rule, the court sets a trial date which is beyond that period and the defendant is or should be aware that the setting is beyond that period, it is his obligation to object at the earliest opportunity so that the court can reset the trial for a date within the proper period. (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Defendant discharged. No person shall be held on recognizance or otherwise to answer a criminal charge for a period in aggregate embracing more than one year from the date the criminal charge against such defendant is filed, or from the date of his arrest on such charge, whichever is later; except where a continuance was had on his motion, or the delay was caused by his act, or where there was not sufficient time to try him during such period because of congestion of the court calendar; provided, however, that in the last-mentioned circumstance, the prosecuting attorney shall file a timely motion for continuance as under subdivision (A) of this rule. Any defendant so held shall, on motion, be discharged.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a] trial de novo is a trial from the beginning and is a trial had as if no action whatever had been instituted in the lower court”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.