Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 N.W.2d 676 - State v. Starnes

State v. Starnes’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 2010

6 state decisions

201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Billstrom · State v. Turnipseed · State v. Sweeney · State v. Strimling · State v. Doughman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]n appellate court will not generally review the trial court’s exercise of its discretion in cases where the sentence imposed is within the presumptive range.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.