Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 P2D 68 - Jameson v. Wurtz

Jameson v. Wurtz’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
April 2009
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently April 2009

22 state decisions

11019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Insurance Company v. Norton · Nelson v. Robinson · Land Development, Inc. v. Padgett · Ford v. Hofer · Hull v. CLEMENS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a. [Payment of the] principal balance due on the contract, plus interest thereon to and including November 21, 1969, in the sum of $6,016.80. No interest is due Defendant from and after November 21, 1969. The tender by Plaintiff was a continuing tender, has been continuously refused by Defendant, and was sufficient to stop interest accruing from and after the refusal of the tender. b. Repayment of sums expended by Defendant for payment of insurance premiums which were the obligation of Plaintiff to pay, in the sum of $487.25, plus interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the date of payment by Defendant until the date of tender of repayment by Plaintiff. c. Repayment of real property taxes for the years 1969 and 1970, paid by Defendant, plus interest thereon at the rate of six per cent per annum from the date of payment by Defendant until the date of tender of repayment by Plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]here the contract involves land the buyer will be relieved from strict forfeiture if enforcement of the forfeiture would cause a loss to him all out of proportion to any injury that might be sustained by the seller.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.