People v. Ramos’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Garcia · The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. · State v. Goode · Lifewise Master Funding v. Telebank · People v. Melillo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To determine whether an opinion is based on specialized knowledge, we look to whether ordinary citizens can be expected to have known the information or have had the experiences that form the basis of the opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“also consider whether the opinion results from 'a process of reasoning familiar in everyday life,' or 'a process of reasoning which can be mastered only by specialists in the field.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An error will only require reversal where it is shown that but for the error, there was a reasonable probability the outcome would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Whitlock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.