Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 So. 2d 1050 - Singleton v. State

396 So. 2d 1050 - Singleton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2012

11 state decisions

601981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on One Lot Emerald Cut Stones One Ring v. United States · Edwards v. State · Carey v. State Ex Rel. Almon · Flint Motor Car Co. v. State · Wright Motor Co. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The requisite notice necessary to excite suspicion and stimulate inquiry is necessarily determined by the facts of each particular case. It may be notice imputed by law, such as the reputation and general character of the violator in the community in which he works and lives. It may be actual notice or knowledge of the violator's disreputable character or conduct."”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““[Section 20-2-93(a)(4)c.] contemplates the forfeiture of encumbered conveyances, subject, of course, to the interests of secured parties. The clear language of the statute evidences a legislative intent to protect bona fide lienholders without destroying the right of the State to condemn a vehicle used in violation of the Controlled Substances Act.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “"(5) All conveyances, including . . . vehicles, . . . which are used, or are intended for use, to transport, or in any manner to facilitate the transportation . . . [or] receipt . . . of any property described in subdivision (1) or (2) of this subsection."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.