396 So. 2d 713 - Jacobs v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2017 · most notably Parker v. Dugger (1991), Proffitt v. Wainwright (1982)
2 federal appellate · 38 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Pope v. Nebraska · 322 So. 2d 908 - Tedder v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“One who participates with another in a common criminal scheme is guilty of all crimes committed in furtherance of that scheme regardless of whether he or she physically participates in that crime.”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“arose from one continuous sequence of events”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“1. Both murders were committed by the Defendant while he was on parole and while he was actually a fugitive from justice. 2. The Defendant does have a significant history of prior criminal activity involving the use or threat of violence to the person of another. * * * 4. The Murders were committed by MR. TAFERO for the purpose of avoiding or preventing lawful arrest or effecting an escape from custody. * * * 5. The Murders were committed to hinder the lawful enforcement of the laws of this State. The victims of these murders, two law enforcement officers, were attempting to enforce the laws of this State after discovering various firearms and various types of drugs and controlled substances in the automobile in which the Defendant was a passenger.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.