Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 396 So. 2d 976 - Sims v. Sims

396 So. 2d 976 - Sims v. Sims’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 1986
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 283 So. 2d 226 - Bernhardt v. Bernhardt · Kemp v. Fernandez · 369 So. 2d 1083 - Brocato v. Brocato

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While the trial judge was in error in this regard, and we do not condone his failure to submit in writing his findings of fact and reasons for judgment, the proper remedy was for appellant to apply for supervisory writs or move for a remand for the purpose of requiring or affording the trial judge an opportunity to comply with the request. Since neither procedure was utilized by appellant, we shall review this appeal on the merits as in any other case where the record contains no reasons for judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.