Brockie v. Shadwick’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
March 1976
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fryrear v. Kentucky I. Terminal R. Co., Inc. · 56 Wash. 2d 904 - Brummett v. Cyr · 103 Ohio App. 11 - Case v. Carter · Bryan v. Battoe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is our opinion that in the situation under discussion (yellow following green) the motorist lawfully may enter the intersection on the yellow light. The purpose of the yellow light is merely to put the motorist on warning that a red signal is coming up and that he must be prepared to stop if the light turns red before he enters the intersection. This is the view taken by the Ohio Court in Case v. Carter, 103 Ohio App. 11 , 142 N.E.2d 670 .” 396 S.W.2d at 65 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Haraszti v. Klarman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.