Noe v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2003
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pointer v. Texas · Mattox v. United States · Turner v. Louisiana · Robert West v. State of Louisiana · Johnston v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Effective January 1, 1965, RCr 7.22 was amended to provide that ‘a duly authenticated transcript of testimony given by a witness in a previous trial of the same defendant on the same charge in the same court shall be the equivalent of a deposition.’ This being clearly procedural, to the extent of inconsistency between RCr 7.22 and KRS 422.150 the rule prevails.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Bugg““(1) The order authorizing the taking of a deposition shall contain such specifications as will fully protect the rights of personal confrontation and cross-examination by the defendant.” Id. (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Dean v. Commonwealth““In all criminal prosecutions, the accused has the right ... to meet the witnesses face to face_” Ky. Const.Sec. 11.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.