See 397 U.S. 929, 90 S.Ct. 900.
John R. Beranek and Charles H. Damsel, Jr., for appellants.
Robert A. Chastain, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
396 U.S. 272
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1970-01-13
Relies on Nacirema Operating Co. v. Johnson
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1970-01-13
Cited by 102 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2017 · most notably United States v. Janis (1976), Portillo v. Commissioner (1991)
45 federal appellate · 7 district · 18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
See 397 U.S. 929, 90 S.Ct. 900.
John R. Beranek and Charles H. Damsel, Jr., for appellants.
Robert A. Chastain, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.