Kradoska v. Kipp’s Empirical Analysis
1979
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably Roy v. City of Augusta (1983), Burns v. Watler (1991)
4 federal appellate · 5 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strong v. United States · Adam v. Saenger · Alvado v. General Motors Corp. · United States v. California & Oregon Land Co. · Northern Pacific Railway Company v. Jacob Slaght
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the measure of a cause of action is the aggregate of connected operative facts that can be handled together conveniently for purposes of trial.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“matters presented for decision were, or might have been litigated in the prior action”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“has been applied chiefly in the interests of judicial economy to bar relitigation of a cause of action that has already been resolved by a valid prior judgment; the scope of the bar extends to all issues “tried or that might have been tried” in the prior action. Bray v. Spencer, 146 Me. 416, 418, 82 A.2d 794, 795 (1951).... In order for the doctrine to be applied, the court must satisfy itself that 1) the same parties, or their privies, are involved; 2) a valid final judgment was entered in the prior action; and 3) the matters presented for decision were, or might have been, litigated in the prior action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Beegan v. Schmidt · Wong v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.