Crow v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
397 F.2d 284 · 1968
Citation profile
45 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 66 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2019 · most notably Fontaine v. United States (1973), 34 Cal. 3d 277 - In Re Ibarra (1983)
45 federal appellate · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 500 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Carafas v. J · Peyton v. Rowe · McNally v. Hill · Parker v. Ellis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 66 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The appellant was represented by counsel and pleaded guilty. The court did not advise him of a right to appeal. We believe the court was under no obligation to do so. Although the 1966 amendments to the Rules of Criminal Procedure were not then in effect, the new Rule 32(a) (2) requires notification of the right to appeal only in a case which has gone to trial on a plea of not guilty. No persuasive reason exists for the application of a different principle under the old rule.” Crow at p. 285 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Younger v. Cox
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.