United States v. Teller’s Empirical Analysis
397 F.2d 494 · 1968
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. Davis (1969), United States v. Giwa (1987)
18 federal appellate · 1 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 12 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. United States · Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz · Page v. Work · Smith v. United States · Wabisky v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant's purse lying on the bed was merely another household item subject to the lawful execution of the search warrant which the federal agents held and were enforcing,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Jackson · State v. Nabarro“only a matter of expediency, custom and style development over the centuries” and in which a woman expects”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“that a woman’s purse occupies a peculiar status” as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.