Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 F.2d 584 - Aaron v. United States

Aaron v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

397 F.2d 584 · 1968

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
3
states following
August 2009
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably State v. Turcio (1979), United States v. Curry (1975)

19 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

19019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1005 · 18 U.S.C. § 656

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Michelson v. United States · Conner v. United States · Brown v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellant was on trial for a crime which involved the question of his honesty and fair dealing. The direct examination of his character witness was properly limited to these areas. Rumors of an illicit affair with a woman, even if these rumors were true, were wholly immaterial to the character traits involved in this case. The question was therefore improper, and the defense objection was properly sustained.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.