Mackris v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
397 F.2d 74 · 1968
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently May 2012
7 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Erie Co v. Tompkins · 19 Cal. 2d 807 - Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving Association · 58 Cal. 2d 601 - Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd. · 32 Cal. 2d 13 - Jorgensen v. Jorgensen · 161 Cal. App. 2d 762 - Nevarov v. Caldwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Substantive Michigan law controls resolution of the legal question presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.