Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

397 F.2d 811

Docket No. 24017.

Dorrough v. United States

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1968-07-25

<p>ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC</p> <p>Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON and CLAYTON, Circuit Judges.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1971

1 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on United States v. Pitt · Dorrough v. United States · United States v. Vickers

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1968-07-25

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

W. B. West, III, Dallas, Tex., for appellant.

B. H. Timmins, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex., for appellee.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM, GEWIN, BELL, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, DYER, SIMPSON and CLAYTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

The District Court denied a motion to vacate a sentence imposed pursuant to a plea of guilty. A panel of this Court, with one Judge dissenting, affirmed, 385 F.2d 887 (1967). On motion of a Judge of this Court in regular active service the appeal was ordered considered en banc.

¶2

Upon such consideration, for the reasons stated in the published opinion of the majority of the panel, the Judgment of the District Court is

¶3

Affirmed.

¶4

Judges WISDOM, THORNBERRY, GOLDBERG, GODBOLD and SIMPSON dissent for the reasons set out in Judge GOLDBERG's dissenting opinion, 385 F.2d 887 at 894.

/397/f2d/811 · .json · Public domain