Warnock v. Archer’s Empirical Analysis
397 F.3d 1024 · 2005
Citation profile
20
cited by 20 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Hensley v. Eckerhart · Blum v. Stenson · Farrar v. Hobby · Ustrak v. Fairman · Mansker v. TMG Life Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'multipl[ies] the number of hours reasonably expended by the reasonable hourly rates.' When determining reasonable hourly rates, district courts may rely on their own experience and knowledge of prevailing market rates.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“produc[ing] satisfactory evidence-in addition to the attorney's own affidavits-that the requested rates are in line with those prevailing in the community for similar services by lawyers of reasonably comparable skill, experience, and reputation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“There is no precise rule or formula for making these determinations. The district court may attempt to identify specific hours that should be eliminated, or it may simply reduce the award to account for ... limited success.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brewington v. Keener
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.