United States v. Ribeiro’s Empirical Analysis
397 F.3d 43 · 2005
Citation profile
17 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Dowdell (2010), United States v. Hicks (2009)
17 federal appellate · 19 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Booker · Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Texas v. Brown · Horton v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“give significant deference to the magistrate judge's initial evaluation”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a practical, common-sense decision whether, -31- given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit before him, . . . there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] warrant application must demonstrate probable cause to believe that (1) a crime has been committed -- the 'commission' element, and (2) enumerated evidence of the offense will be found at the place to be searched -- the so-called 'nexus' element.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.