Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 F.3d 596 - Shanklin v. Fitzgerald

Shanklin v. Fitzgerald’s Empirical Analysis

397 F.3d 596 · 2005

Citation profile

73
cited by 73 later decisions
February 2023
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Singletary v. Missouri Department of Corrections (2005), Johnson v. Arden (2010)

45 federal appellate · 4 district ·

460200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stuart v. General Motors Corp. · Davenport v. Riverview Gardens School District · Kneibert v. Thomson Newspapers, Michigan Inc. · Kristen Dhyne/cross v. Meiners Thriftway Inc /cross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A gap in time between the protected activity and the adverse employment action weakens an inference of retaliatory motive.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[w]ith [a] lengthy delay [of ten months], any causal nexus inference tends to evaporate”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “‘Absent exceptional circumstances, we cannot consider issues not raised”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.