Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

397 F. App'x 859

Clement v. LaHood

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided October 7, 2010

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2010-10-07

Decided 2010-10-07

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Audrey Clement and John Reeder appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Government and dismissing Clement’s civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Clement and Reeder’s motion for a stay pending appeal and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Clement v. LaHood, No. 1:09-cv-01056-CMH-IDD, 2010 WL 1779701 (E.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the *860materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/397/fappx/859 · .json · Public domain