Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 F. Supp. 2d 706 - Johnson v. Sosebee

397 F. Supp. 2d 706 - Johnson v. Sosebee’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1114 (§ 32 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Perini Corporation v. Perini Construction Inc · Lone Star Steakhouse Saloon Incorporated v. Alpha of Virginia Incorporated · Dawn Donut Co. v. Hart's Food Stores, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “standard for liability for trademark infringement under the South Carolina Unfair Trade Practices Act [UTPA], like that of the Lanham Act, is likelihood of consumer confusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.