Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 N.J. Super. 8 - State v. AO

397 N.J. Super. 8 - State v. AO’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Faretta v. California · Manson v. Brathwaite · United States v. Scheffer · Benjamin v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “foundation of our evidence rules . . . is to provide the fact-finder with only reliable and probative evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “the Sixth Amendment right to counsel does not attach in the investigative stage, this does not mean that an uncounseled defendant may . . . be induced to make binding decisions concerning trial strategy which ordinarily would be made in consultation with trial counsel.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “nothing in the Guenther opinion that would necessarily limit the holding to only a prior false accusation, as opposed to a false accusation made a short time after the accusation against the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.