Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 NW2D 512 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2011

5 state decisions

301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ware · State v. Boose · 32 Tex. Crim. 580 - Hyatt v. State · City of Alton v. Bergesch · 33 Tex. Crim. 100 - Harkey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is something fundamentally unfair about letting a person with a complaint have it both ways. Such a person is not entitled to a no-lose advantage. Defendant should not be allowed to await the verdict, which might have acquitted him, before alerting the trial court of his complaint.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.