Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 1989
13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Engler v. State of Oklahoma · Maiden v. State · 96 Okla. Crim. 266 - Arnold v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"In the case on Engler v. State, Okl.Cr., 316 P.2d 625 , this Court held: ‘Permitting evidence in chief, over objection of the defendant of his refusal to take “Sobriety Test” is prejudicial error and is reversible upon review.’ You will note this states ‘of his refusal to take “Sobriety Test” * * * ’”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Vernon v. State · Allen v. State““The fact that any person charged with a violation of this paragraph is or has been lawfully entitled to use such narcotic drug, barbiturate, amphetamine, marihuana, or other drug shall not constitute a defense against any charge of violating this paragraph.” Title 47, O.S.A. § 11-902, sub-section (b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hayes v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.