397 So. 2d 1331 - State v. Bates’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
48 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently August 2007 · most notably 414 So. 2d 741 - State v. Huizar (1982), State v. Chaney (1982)
48 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 384 So. 2d 355 - State v. Bonanno · 360 So. 2d 500 - State v. Drew · 369 So. 2d 118 - State v. Cox · 374 So. 2d 1195 - State v. Spencer · State v. Leggett
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Art. 797. Challenge for cause "The state or the defendant may challenge a juror for cause on the ground that: ... "(2) The juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his partiality. An opinion or impression as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant shall not of itself be sufficient ground of challenge to a juror, if he declares, and the court is satisfied, that he can render an impartial verdict according to the law and the evidence;... "(4) The juror will not accept the law as given to him by the court;...."”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Relevant evidence is that tending to show the commission of the offense and the intent, or tending to negate the commission of the offense and the intent. Facts necessary to be known to explain a relevant fact, or which support an inference raised by such fact, are admissible."”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“A. A photograph of property alleged to be the object of a theft, otherwise admissible, may be admitted as evidence without regard to the availability of the property itself. * * *”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.