397 So. 2d 199 - Parker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently March 2013 · most notably 474 So. 2d 168 - Bush v. City of Troy (1985), 613 So. 2d 1235 - Delchamps, Inc. v. Larry (1992)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Draper v. United States · 337 So. 2d 321 - Patton v. City of Decatur · 368 So. 2d 581 - Hancock v. State · 371 So. 2d 962 - Rudolph v. State · 341 So. 2d 174 - McClendon v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The record book was properly admitted into evidence as a business record which is an exception to the hearsay rule, and `[a]ll other circumstances of the making of such record, including lack of personal knowledge by the entrant or maker, may be shown to affect its weight, but they shall not affect its admissibility.' Section 12-21-43 , Code of Alabama 1975; Bagony v. City of Birmingham , Ala.Cr.App., 365 So.2d 336 (1978); Gamble, McElroy's Alabama Evidence , 254.01 (1)-.01 (3), .01 (14) (3d ed. 1977). See generally, Thompson v. State , Ala.Cr.App., 384 So.2d 1131 (1979), cert. denied, Ala., 384 So.2d 1135 (1980). Consequently, appellant's contention is without merit."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Section 32-5-193 (d) places no duty upon any law enforcement agency administering such tests to inform or notify the accused that he may have an independent blood alcohol test performed. The option set out in § 32-5-193 (d) is addressed to the discretion of the person tested and in no way affects the admissibility of the test given at the behest of the State. The very language of that section refutes the appellant's argument on this issue. Consequently, no error was committed in this regard."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.