397 So. 2d 217 - Terry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 65 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably 494 So. 2d 124 - Magwood v. State (1985), 440 So. 2d 1155 - Brewer v. State (1983)
2 federal appellate · 65 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Katz v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Escobedo v. Illinois · United States v. Santana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defense counsel made no objections to the trial judge's words and gestures toward the witness and the record fails to reflect any improper conduct of the trial judge which prejudiced the defendant. Terry , supra. Without objection having been made at trial, the defendant has no basis of complaint on appeal. While a judge must remain impartial, he is not a robot or a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““There [was] no showing that the occurrence affected the jury and no request that the jury be polled at the time. The trial judge was in a more advantageous position to observe what occurred than we are. He was able to observe what transpired and its effect upon the trial of the case and upon the jury.” Id.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bolduc“Miranda warnings are not required simply because the questioned person is one whom the police suspect or one on whom the investigation has focused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.