397 So. 2d 434
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 28, 1981
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1981-04-28
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently May 1994
3 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“It is further my finding that in the event the claimant shall require a total knee replacement at some date in the future, the same would be solely for relief of the symptoms caused by the aggravation of his pre-existing condition, which symptoms are the direct result of the subject accident.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 586 So. 2d 1132 - Keller Kitchen Cabinets v. Holder
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1981-04-28
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We direct that the fourth sentence in finding number two be stricken from the deputy commissioner’s compensation order which reads:
It is further my finding that in the event the claimant shall require a total knee replacement at some date in the future, the same would be solely for relief of the symptoms caused by the aggravation of his pre-existing condition, which symptoms are the direct result of the subject accident.
¶2The order is otherwise affirmed.