Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 SW2D 220 - Salazar v. State

Salazar v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1965

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 1988
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 1988

11 state decisions

70196519701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Burns v. State · McMurrey v. State · 158 Tex. Crim. 35 - Grims v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We cannot bring ourselves to conclude that the mere exhibition of scars standing alone constitutes reversible error. “The burden is upon the appellants to impress this Court with the Gruesomeness of the exhibition.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.