Vick v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1985
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 158 Tex. Crim. 145 - Gibbs v. State · 165 Tex. Crim. 244 - Martinez v. State · 171 Tex. Crim. 231 - Lewis v. State · Ex parte Sangster · 169 Tex. Crim. 484 - Waite v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the doctrine of carving, the State may carve and prosecute for any offense it may elect which grows out of the same transaction. 1 Branch’s Anno. P.C., 2nd ed., 625, Sec. 654; Martinez v. State, 165 Tex.Cr.R. 244 , 306 S.W.2d 131 . The fact that testimony relied upon by the State to show the offense charged against an accused also develops facts which constitute another independent crime does not prevent a conviction for the offense on trial. Fuentes v. State, 163 Tex.Cr.R. 410 , 292 S.W.2d 117 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Nielson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.