Kiser v. Bartley Mining Company’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently May 2019
5 federal appellate · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Tafel Electric Co. · Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Marshall · Osborne Mining Corporation v. Blackburn · Tyler-Couch Const. Co. v. Elmore · Keeney v. Commonwealth, Department of Highways
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ome jurisdictions hold that an amendment to a workmen's compensation law extending the period of limitations on a claim should not be construed as being applicable to claims that arose before the amendment took effect, ... [while others hold] that such an amendment properly may be considered applicable to claims that arose before the amendment, where the previously existing limitation had not run on those claims at the time the amendment became effective.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cassidy v. Adams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.