Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 U.S. 301 - United States v. Davis

United States v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

299
cited by 299 later decisions
7
cited 7 times by the Supreme Court
June 2014
most recently cited

146 federal appellate · 9 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 299 later decisions (7 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2014 · most notably Commissioner v. Clark (1989), Dunn v. Commissioner (1978)

146 federal appellate · 9 district ·

153019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedDavis v. United States (from Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Eisner v. Macomber · Byrne v. Karalexis · United States v. Sisson · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Bedford's Estate · Commissioner v. Gordon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 299 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * a redemption must result in a meaningful reduction of the shareholder’s proportionate interest in the corporation. * * *”
    23 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “not essentially equivalent to a dividend”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “such a redemption is always 'essentially equivalent to a dividend' within the meaning of that phrase in § 302(b)(1).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.