Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 U.S. 436 - Ashe v. Swenson

Ashe v. Swenson’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

8,017
cited by 8,017 later decisions
170
cited 170 times by the Supreme Court
50
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

2,195 federal appellate · 228 district · 4,268 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8,017 later decisions (170 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Brown v. Ohio (1977), United States v. Dixon (1993)

2,195 federal appellate · 228 district · 4,268 state decisions — followed in 50 states

2.2k0197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedBob Fred Ashe v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden (from Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Blockburger v. United States · Bruton v. United States · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · North Carolina v. Pearce

Cited together with Blockburger v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · Green v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · North Carolina v. Pearce

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8,017 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit.”
    581 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “bars relitigation between the same parties of issues actually determined at a previous trial....”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “not guilty due to insufficient evidence.”
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.