Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 397 U.S. 82 - Reetz v. Bozanich

Reetz v. Bozanich’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

1,053
cited by 1,053 later decisions
52
cited 52 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

349 federal appellate · 180 district · 29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,053 later decisions (52 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Delaware v. Van Arsdall (1986), Steffel v. Thompson (1974)

349 federal appellate · 180 district · 29 state decisions

8520197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Zwickler v. Koota · England v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners · Meredith v. City of Winter Haven · Harman v. Forssenius

Cited together with Railroad Commission v. Pullman Co. · Zwickler v. Koota · Askew v. Hargrave · Harman v. Forssenius · Wisconsin v. Constantineau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,053 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Proper exercise of federal jurisdiction requires that controversies involving unsettled questions of state law be decided in the state tribunals preliminary to a federal court’s consideration of the underlying federal constitutional questions. * * * That is especially desirable where the questions of state law are enmeshed with the federal questions.””
    18 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only in narrowly limited `special circumstances.'”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'needless friction' between federal pronouncements and state policies.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.